Representative Van Fossen

Jamie Van Fossen


The Week In Review 
Printer friendly page    

March 31, 2006
E-mail: jamie.van.fossen@legis.state.ia.us 

 Session Week 12
Fax: 563-355-9954

HOUSE BILL WILL BOOST ETHANOL, SOY DIESEL

 The Iowa House passed a series of incentives this week to boost ethanol usage in Iowa.
 The bill, House File 2754, establishes a partnership between consumers, retailers and farmers in Iowa to increase the consumption of renewable fuels and decrease the reliance on foreign oil.
 Approximately 8 percent of the fuel currently used in Iowa is renewable, and the House bill hopes to increase that percentage to 25 percent by the year 2025.
 Iowa is the largest producer of ethanol, with 27 ethanol plants up-and-running by the end of this year.  Currently, 80 percent of Iowa drivers use 10 percent ethanol blend.
 The House hopes to increase the use of cars and trucks that can run on an 85 percent blend, or “flex-fuel” vehicles, as they are commonly known.  However, less than 30 retailers in Iowa sell the E85 blend. 
 Contained within a separate bill, House File 2759, was $6 million in funding for retailers to begin installing E85 pumps.  A number of tax credits to increase renewable fuel usage were also included within the bill.

REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFRENCE INCREASES ESTIMATE, NEW REVENUE NOT NEEDED TO FUND PRIORITIES

 On Friday, March 24, the Revenue Estimating Conference (REC) met and increased the General Fund revenue estimates for FY 06 and FY 07.  The strength of the economy and corresponding increase in tax collections should not be used as an excuse to increase the amount of new general fund expenditures.
 The December REC estimate for FY 06 was 1.5 percent, which left approximately $120 million in the ending balance to fund the property tax credits.  The REC upped the revenue estimate for gross receipts to 2.1 percent, not including another $30.4 million in TouchPlay revenue.  The estimate also includes $54.6 million from the federal government due to the Intergovernmental Transfers (IGT) program, but that money is just passed through the General Fund and does not increase the amount of net General Fund revenue.
 The total increase in net revenue for FY 06 is $90 million more than the December REC estimate.  This will allow the property tax credits to be funded at last year’s level of $160 million without having to make a transfer from the Cash Reserve Fund (CRF).  (There is a slight increase to the military service tax credit, due to a bill which was approved by the House extending the deadline for those who file for the credit.)
 The remaining ending balance after the tax credits are funded is split evenly with $23 million going into the Senior Living Trust Fund (SLTF) and $23 million deposited into the CRF, filling the CRF to 7.5 percent.  There is $24 million currently in the Economic Emergency Fund (EEF), which leaves it $106 million short of being full at 2.5 percent.  However, if actual revenue exceeds the REC estimate, one-half of that surplus will flow into the EEF because of the CRF being filled to 7.5 percent.  Since revenue is running above the revised estimate, there is a very good chance that revenue will exceed the new estimate.
  House Republicans believe that the shared priorities of the Legislature and Governor can be funded within the $280 million in increased spending allowed by the December REC estimate.
 There is plenty of room within the House GOP budget to rearrange the budget pie to fund the priorities of teacher performance pay, empowerment zones for early childhood, higher education and salaries for our correctional officers and social workers.  We look forward to sitting down with the Senate and Governor to identify their priorities and where they would cut in order to fund them.
 The bottom line is that the increase in the REC estimates supports the House GOP budget plan that funds our priorities of education, health care and public safety while at the same time repaying funds borrowed in past years without increasing the amount of new General Fund expenditures.

HOUSE WAYS and MEANS COMMITTEE APPROVES PROPERTY TAX REFORM

On Wednesday, March 22nd, the House Ways and Means Committee approved House Study Bill 766, now House File 2771 House File 2771 is similar to House File 847, which was approved in 2005.
 This bill is comprised of  six major components:|
1.)Ties together the assessment limitation of residential, agricultural, commercial and industrial property by limiting the percent increase of all classes to the class of property that has the lowest percent increase under the allowable 4% limit.
2.)Requires a vote of city council or board of supervisors to occur on increases in property tax revenues.
3.)States that property related services are funded first if the city or county has a reduced revenue capacity
4.)Requires a city to implement the statutory
transition for the imposition of city taxes against property to be annexed if the property is included in a voluntary annexation application without the consent of the landowner


5.)Changes the number of signatures required to protest a budget from at least 100 to at least ¼ of 1 percent of those voting for the office of governor at the last general election.  This cannot be less than 10 nor more than 100.
6.)Eliminates County Compensation Boards

 The key piece in House File 2771, is the tying of the assessment limitation for all classes of property.  Currently, commercial and industrial property owners are taxed on nearly 100% of their assessed valuation, while residential property owners pay taxes on approximately 48% of the assessed value.
 By tying all classes of property together, the rapid growth of property taxes on commercial and industrial property is slowed.  This only impacts new growth and new valuations; not new construction.
House File 2771 would not cause an automatic commercial rollback to the residential level of 48%.  The proposed legislation only impacts future growth.  The rollback can only go down if there is growth – there must be growth first.  This will not erode the current tax base of local governments, nor will it impact the current level of revenues collected.
How would House File 2771 affect taxpayers?
-Homeowners:  All factors remain the same for residential property.  Homeowners would not see a property tax increase from this bill because residential property does not lose the assessment limitation that it is currently under.
-Agricultural Property:  All factors remain unchanged for agricultural property.
-Commercial and Industrial:  Slows the rapid increases on commercial and industrial property taxes.  All classes of property assessments will move together, either up or down, and no one class of property will have to carry more of the burden.

VAN FOSSEN OUTLINES PRIORITIES FOR RE-ELECTION

(DAVENPORT) – Rep. Jamie Van Fossen, R-Davenport, announced today that he will seek re-election to the Iowa House of Representatives in Davenport’s House District 81. Van Fossen, who was first elected in 1996, says he will continue to be a taxpayer advocate, with job creation and health care reform as top priorities.
 “I will continue fighting for Iowa taxpayers, continuing to make property tax reform my number one priority,” said Van Fossen, who chairs the powerful Ways and Means tax-writing committee. “We passed significant tax reform legislation the past two years, but it saw a dead-end in the evenly divided Senate. That logjam needs fixed before our tax system itself can be improved.”
 Not to be overlooked in the equation, he continued, is the adverse affect of Iowa’s high property taxes toward growth and development.
 “Too often, property taxes are not at the forefront of economic development discussions,” he said. “Iowa businesses pay the third highest property taxes in the country, and Iowa residents pay the 16th highest. That’s hardly rolling out the welcome mat for anyone considering a move here.”
 Van Fossen steered a bill through the House this year that would eliminate taxes on pensions and Social Security, something he needs the Davenport area desperately needs.
 “How many of our seniors need to hop over the river before we act?” said Van Fossen, noting that the bill is mired in the Senate. “This bill passed with more than 80 votes in the House and if it isn’t signed into law this year, I will bring it up again and again until it is. This is too great of a priority to give up on, and I will stand my ground.”
 Additionally, Van Fossen supports pending legislation that will allow small business owners to pool their resources and drive down health care costs.
 “As costs of health care premiums have escalated, small businesses cannot keep up,” said Van Fossen. “By allowing employers to group together their resources, health insurance costs will decrease and more working families can attain coverage. I believe businesses, better than government, can offer a health care plan that Iowans need.”
 Van Fossen says Iowa needs to see the global marketplace as an opportunity, or risk falling behind.
 “The global economy is here, and with its great rewards comes even greater challenges,” he continued. “The number one thing we can do to compete is to challenge our students in the classroom. Foreign countries are rapidly progressing in math and the sciences, and Iowa must remain in the lead by offering a tough and rigorous curriculum for Iowa’s students.”
 Van Fossen cited a number of education reform bills that passed through the House this year that would give increased accountability to parents and taxpayers, ensuring their full partnership in a student’s educational experience.
 “Those are the biggest stakeholders,” said Van Fossen. “They should be fully involved in the process and curriculum.”
 Van Fossen made his re-election plans official at the River Music Experience Thursday night. The General Election is November 7.

   Week in Review Archives

2006 Session
03-24-06
03-17-06
03-10-06
03-03-06
02-24-06
02-10-06
02-03-06
01-27-06
01-20-06
01-13-06

2005 Session
05-20-05
05-13-05
05-06-05
04-29-05
04-22-05
04-15-05
04-08-05
04-01-05
03-25-05
03-18-05
03-11-05
03-04-05
02-25-05
02-18-05
02-11-05
02-04-05
01-28-05
01-21-05
01-14-05

2004 Session
09-07-04
04-28-04
04-16-04
04-09-04
04-02-04
03-26-04
03-19-04
03-12-04
03-05-04
02-27-04
02-20-04
02-13-04
02-06-04
01-30-04
01-23-04
01-16-04

2003 Session
06-04-03 Special Session
05-30-03 Special Session
05-02-03
04-25-03
04-18-03
04-11-03
04-04-03
03-28-03
03-21-03
03-14-03
03-07-03
02-28-03
02-21-03
02-14-03
02-07-03
01-31-03
01-17-03
01-24-03

2002 Session
05-28-02 Special Session II 
05-10-02 Special Edition
04-22-02 Special Session I
04-12-02
04-05-02
03-29-02
03-22-02
03-15-02

03-08-02

03-01-02
02-22-02
02-15-02
02-08-02

02-01-02
01-25-02
01-18-02

2001 Session
05-04-01
04-27-01
04-20-01
04-13-01
04-06-01

03-30-01

03-23-01
03-16-01
03-09-01
03-02-01
02-23-01
02-16-01
02-09-01
02-02-01
01-26-01
01-19-01

01-12-01

2000 Session
04-28-00
04-21-00
04-14-00
04-07-00
03-31-00
03-24-00
03-17-00
03-10-00
03-03-00
02-25-00