Representative Van Fossen

Jamie Van Fossen


The Week In Review 
Printer friendly page    

February 3, 2006
E-mail: jamie.van.fossen@legis.state.ia.us 

 Session Week 4
Fax: 563-355-9954

HOUSE REPUBLICANS COME TO THE AID OF SENIORS WITH ELIMINATION OF TAXES ON RETIREMENT INCOME

 On Tuesday, House Republicans tackled the most significant piece of tax relief in recent years by phasing out pension and Social Security taxes for Iowa’s seniors, and eliminating income taxes on low-to moderate-wage earning Iowans 65 and older.

House Republicans believe this has long been an unfair tax that shackles our seniors – those who have paid into a system all of their lives – based solely on the fact that they want to remain in Iowa.

Seniors provide a wealth of volunteer hours in our communities, and they are the angel investors that build our ballparks, libraries and community centers.  When they leave the state, they leave the communities that raise their grandchildren and employ their children.

The legislation, HF 2045, is a five-year phase-out of the state tax on both pensions and Social Security benefits.  The phase-out begins in calendar year 2007.

Also in the bill, beginning in calendar year 2008, single Iowans 65 and older will not be taxed on their income up to $36,000, and married individuals will not pay income taxes on their first $48,000.

This includes rental income from farmland and capital gains, plus other areas of common income.

Retirement Tax Cuts

  • The government bureaucracy is complaining that we are taking this money off the table.  Well Republicans would rather take it off the government’s table and put it back onto our senior’s kitchen table.
  • In the last election, we heard a lot about prescription drug costs for seniors.  How we would not want to see seniors have to choose between food and prescription drugs.  Well here is our chance to help seniors afford both.
  • We go to great lengths to protect government’s ability to spend.  Why don’t we go to those same great lengths to help Iowans save?
  • Eliminating the tax on pension and social security income along with excluding certain income for Iowans 65 and older will help retired Iowans take care of themselves and reduce their dependence on government services thereby reducing the cost to the taxpayer.
  • You cannot have strong communities if you are driving seniors and grandparents out of the state because of high taxes.
  • You cannot have strong communities if your seniors are unable to enjoy their family and participate in their communities because high taxes limit their income and drive them out of the state.

How will Republicans pay for this tax cut?

Republicans and Democrats both supported this tax cut.  Which means we will both have make sure it fits within our budget.  Furthermore, Governor Vilsack said in his Condition of the State speech that we have the fastest growing economy in the Midwest and the eighth fastest growing economy in the nation.  Growing revenue will help refill any dip in revenue because of this tax cut.

 HOUSE APPROVES REPAYMENT TO SENIOR LIVING TRUST FUND, KEEPS PROMISE TO IOWA’S SENIORS

On Monday, January 30, the House unanimously approved HF 2002, which keeps the House Republicans’ promise to seniors by increasing the amount required to be repaid to the Senior Living Trust Fund.

The Senior Living Trust Fund (SLTF) was created by the Legislature in 2000 to implement assisted living programs to keep seniors from having to be placed in nursing homes.  It was funded with $300 million in federal funds, which came to the state during FY 2001 to FY 2005.

 However, due to the recession that began in the second half of FY 2001, the Legislature borrowed funds from the SLTF to fund Medicaid.  This was necessary because the other choices would have been to eliminate services, decrease eligibility or, even worse, raise taxes.

 

 In 2002, the Legislature approved language-mandating repayment of $118 million to the SLTF without specifying a repayment mechanism.  In 2004, the Legislature approved language evenly splitting the General Fund ending balance between the Cash Reserve Fund and SLTF beginning at the end of FY 06.

 HF 2002 increases the amount to be repaid to the SLTF to $300 million.  It does not change the mechanism splitting the ending balance or require appropriations be made from the General Fund to the SLTF.  However, the House Republican budget targets will propose making appropriations from the General Fund and taxable portion of the tobacco bonds in order to accelerate repayment to the SLTF.

 There is evidence that the STLF is working as the nursing homes admit that bed numbers have leveled off due to the increased funding for assisted living.  This in turn decreases the amount needed to fund Medicaid.  By repaying the fund, it will allow for an expansion of assisted living programs and further decrease Medicaid costs for seniors.

 HF 2002 was approved on a 98-0 vote and now goes to the Senate.  The Governor has expressed reservations about the bill because he wants the ending balance to go to a new spending program he claims will make schools more “efficient”.  House Republicans believe that rather than starting new programs, keeping our commitment to seniors and repaying borrowed funds should take precedence.

HOUSE PANEL TAKES UP EMINENT DOMAIN

The eminent domain issue came into focus last year in the wake of the Kelo decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, which seemed to grant broader power to governmental entities to use eminent domain for the purposes of economic development.  A number of states have already acted to clarify that their laws do not allow the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.

HF 2120 is one of four bills currently filed in Iowa that address the issues relating to eminent domain highlighted in the Kelo decision.  HF 2120 generally attempts to do the following:

1.  Limit the use of eminent domain to strictly public uses.

2.  Provide a definition of public use.

3.  Provide an expanded definition of “just compensation” to include any expense associated with condemnation of private property through eminent domain.

4.  Provide additional procedural safeguards for property owners in the event a governmental entity determines that their land needs to be condemned and the landowner is unwilling to sell.

This bill does not remove the ability of a governmental entity to condemn land through eminent domain.  It does, however, disallow a governmental entity from using eminent domain for economic development purposes and requires that entity to provide significant justification for using eminent domain.


Ways & Means Update

Bills introduced in committee this week:

HF 2001- A bill for an act exempting the sale of certain school supplies from the sales and use taxes during a specified time.

HF 2026- A bill for an act exempting the sale of certain school supplies from the sales and use taxes during a specified time.

HF 2072- A bill for an act exempting the sale of certain school supplies from the sales and use taxes during a specified time.

HSB 593-A study bill for updating the Code references to the Internal Revenue Code and including retroactive applicability and effective date provisions.


Bills passed out  of committee this week:

No Bills passed out of committee this week.

   Week in Review Archives

2006 Session
01-27-06
01-20-06
01-13-06

2005 Session
05-20-05
05-13-05
05-06-05
04-29-05
04-22-05
04-15-05
04-08-05
04-01-05
03-25-05
03-18-05
03-11-05
03-04-05
02-25-05
02-18-05
02-11-05
02-04-05
01-28-05
01-21-05
01-14-05

2004 Session
09-07-04
04-28-04
04-16-04
04-09-04
04-02-04
03-26-04
03-19-04
03-12-04 Rep
03-05-04
02-27-04
02-20-04
02-13-04
02-06-04
01-30-04
01-23-04
01-16-04

2003 Session
06-04-03 Special Session
05-30-03 Special Session
05-02-03
04-25-03
04-18-03
04-11-03
04-04-03
03-28-03
03-21-03
03-14-03
03-07-03
02-28-03
02-21-03
02-14-03
02-07-03
01-31-03
01-17-03
01-24-03

2002 Session
05-28-02 Special Session II 
05-10-02 Special Edition
04-22-02 Special Session I
04-12-02
04-05-02
03-29-02
03-22-02
03-15-02

03-08-02

03-01-02
02-22-02
02-15-02
02-08-02

02-01-02
01-25-02
01-18-02

2001 Session
05-04-01
04-27-01
04-20-01
04-13-01
04-06-01

03-30-01

03-23-01
03-16-01
03-09-01
03-02-01
02-23-01
02-16-01
02-09-01
02-02-01
01-26-01
01-19-01

01-12-01

2000 Session
04-28-00
04-21-00
04-14-00
04-07-00
03-31-00
03-24-00
03-17-00
03-10-00
03-03-00
02-25-00