Representative Van Fossen

Jamie Van Fossen


The Week In Review 
Printer friendly page    

January 18, 2008
E-mail: jamie.van.fossen@legis.state.ia.us 

 Session Week 1
Fax: 563-355-9954

2008 SESSION OF THE IOWA GENERAL ASSEMBLY CALLED TO ORDER

Representatives and Senators from all corners of our great state gathered Monday, January 14th at 10:00 AM CST to organize for the peoples business for 2008.

 I promised in my release of  New Years Resolutions  at the beginning of January, to; Protect Iowa’s “Right to Work” laws, make sure students come first, make health care more affordable, be a watchdog for homeowners on property taxes, and eliminate out of control state spending (1).

I look forward to working for you this legislative session!

(1)     See release at: www.JamieVanFossen.com

GOVERNOR CULVER RELEASES BUDGET- SPENDING INCREASES OVER 20 PERCENT IN TWO YEARS

On Tuesday, January 15, the Governor Culver released his budget recommendations for FY 2009.  Despite talking about the need to keep the state’s fiscal house in order, the budget is loaded with tax increases to pay for the $1 billion spending increase over two years.

Despite saying that all of the built-in spending approved last year ($625 million worth) will remain in place, the Governor claims that spending in FY 09 will increase by only $361.7 million, or 6 percent compared to FY 08.

He accomplishes this by shifting $178 million of off-budget spending into FY 08, not counting another $82 million for the FY 09 property tax credits or any other supplemental appropriations. 

The big ticket items shifted into the FY 08 general fund are:

-$69.7 million from the Healthy Iowans Tobacco Trust

-$50.2 million for the property tax credits

-$32 million from the Rebuild Iowa Infrastructure Fund

-$15 million for Resource Enhancement and Protection (REAP)

He is shifting both the spending for these programs as well as the revenue that currently is used to finance them.  The effect of doing this is to increase FY 08 to a huge level and thereby decrease the size of the FY 09 increase.  The original FY 08 increase, when supplemental appropriations were factored in, was $585 million, or 11 percent above FY 07.  Adding in the additional $178 million will make the FY 08 increase $763 million, or a whopping 14 percent above FY 07.  Even using the Governor's numbers, that would mean a two-year increase of 20 percent above FY 07.

Tax the Poor and Middle class

Even with revenue running at a whopping 10 percent growth rate, the Governor proposes $100 million in tax and fee increases.  The "bottle bill" tax increase is projected to bring in another $20 million.  It will be difficult for the majority party to pass either of these tax increases and if they don't, they will have a huge hole in their budget if they want to appropriate at or above the Governor's level.  That leaves them two choices – cutting spending or dipping into the cash reserves.

Tax the Job creators

Combined corporate income tax increase, projected to increase revenue by $25 million last year, is projected to bring in $70 million now. 

Despite the tax increases, the Governor offers no proposals to deal with high property taxes.  With property owners facing a $500 million tax increase over the next six years, House Republicans will push for property tax reform including having the state picking up the tab for the property tax increase associated with allowable growth.

With revenue increasing by over 10 percent and nearly $100 million in tax increases, the Governor still cannot balance the budget without raising the cap on gaming revenue going into the general fund.  In FY 08, the cap will increase from $60 million to $90 million.  In FY 09, the cap is raised to $180 million.  That means he triples the amount going into the general fund and not going to infrastructure projects.

Then, the Governor recommends using a convoluted "sub-prime" way of funding the new infrastructure projects - issuing "interest-only" bonds where the state would not pay off any principle for the first four to five years.  He also wants to securitize the remaining 22 percent of tobacco proceeds and use two-thirds of the proceeds for the new prison in Fort Madison and deposits one-third into the general fund. For more information from the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Services Agency log on to: http://staffweb.legis.state.ia.us/lfb/docs/BudgAnalysis/BudgAnalysis.htm

 

 REP. VAN FOSSEN’S RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNORS BUDGET


The Governor's budget spends $6.4 billion in FY 09. When combined with his budget last year, the government spending increase is more than $1 billion. That's a $1 billion increase in two years. That's a 20 percent increase over a two-year period. For a point of reference, the EIGHT bipartisan budgets proposed and approved by Governor Vilsack and Republicans grew by $1 billion.

Despite strong revenue growth (over 10 percent growth year-to-date), the Governor still proposes at least $100 million in new tax and fee increases. The big items are a $70 million corporate tax increase and a $20 million tax increase on beer, pop, juice and water.

Property Tax Payers left in the cold
Even though he is increasing spending by over $1 billion, there is nothing in the budget for the property taxpayers. He left property tax relief measures completely out of the budget. According to the nonpartisan Fiscal Services, property owners face a $500 million tax increase over the next six years.

Not included in the current spending proposals is at least another $500 million in bond debt to build new prisons. While I believe that money should be spent to keep the public safe, using gimmicks like "interest-only" bonds will mean an enormous cost to the taxpayers.

House Republicans voted for an average of $350 million in spending last session. This means out of $6 billion budget, House Republicans approved of just $350 million of it, not counting allowable growth. Had Gov. Culver and Legislature Democrats worked with Legislative Republicans and acted with a spirit of bipartisanship, taxpayers wouldn't be staring at a $1 billion spending increase.

LOCAL CONTROL OF SMOKING LIGHTS UP FIRST WEEK
Local smoking bans in public places appear to be the dominant issue facing the Local Government Committee this session.

The Committee has two holdover bills from last session. Senate File 236 and House File 778

The difference between the two bills is that last year Local Government Committee adopted a provision exempting bars and casinos on a non-record roll call vote of 12-8, with one member absent. The Committee then passed the bill to the floor by a slim 11 – 9 vote.

A brief summary of the proposed bill is as follows:

The bill allows your city or county to enforce a smoking ordinance more stringent than current Iowa law.

The city or county could also regulate the signage required to notify patrons of the city or county’s smoking status. The ordinance could also set a penalty higher than the current state law penalty of a $25 fine.

The ordinance could:

-Eliminate or limit smoking in factories, warehouses and similar places of work not usually frequented by the general public, and rooms or halls used for social function.
-Prohibit the designation of a smoking area
-Eliminate or limit smoking in a “public place” As amended by the Local Government Committee, a restaurant is still a public place but a bar or a casino is not and smoking in those facilities can not be regulated locally.
 

 

Ways & Means Update

Bills introduced in committee this week:


			

			

			

			

			

			

			

			
 
Bills from the 2007 session were re-assigned.

Bills passed out of committee this week:

No bills passed out of committee this week

 

   Week in Review Archives

2008 Session
01-18-08

2007 Session
02-23-07
02-16-07
02-09-07
02-02-07
01-26-07
01-12-07

 

2006 Session
05-05-06
04-28-06
04-21-06
04-14-06
04-07-06
03-31-06
03-24-06
03-17-06
03-10-06
03-03-06
02-24-06
02-10-06
02-03-06
01-27-06
01-20-06
01-13-06

2005 Session
05-20-05
05-13-05
05-06-05
04-29-05
04-22-05
04-15-05
04-08-05
04-01-05
03-25-05
03-18-05
03-11-05
03-04-05
02-25-05
02-18-05
02-11-05
02-04-05
01-28-05
01-21-05
01-14-05

2004 Session
09-07-04
04-28-04
04-16-04
04-09-04
04-02-04
03-26-04
03-19-04
03-12-04
03-05-04
02-27-04
02-20-04
02-13-04
02-06-04
01-30-04
01-23-04
01-16-04

2003 Session
06-04-03 Special Session
05-30-03 Special Session
05-02-03
04-25-03
04-18-03
04-11-03
04-04-03
03-28-03
03-21-03
03-14-03
03-07-03
02-28-03
02-21-03
02-14-03
02-07-03
01-31-03
01-17-03
01-24-03

2002 Session
05-28-02 Special Session II 
05-10-02 Special Edition
04-22-02 Special Session I
04-12-02
04-05-02
03-29-02
03-22-02
03-15-02

03-08-02

03-01-02
02-22-02
02-15-02
02-08-02

02-01-02
01-25-02
01-18-02

2001 Session
05-04-01
04-27-01
04-20-01
04-13-01
04-06-01

03-30-01

03-23-01
03-16-01
03-09-01
03-02-01
02-23-01
02-16-01
02-09-01
02-02-01
01-26-01
01-19-01

01-12-01

2000 Session
04-28-00
04-21-00
04-14-00
04-07-00
03-31-00
03-24-00
03-17-00
03-10-00
03-03-00
02-25-00