Representative Van Fossen

Jamie Van Fossen


The Week In Review 
Printer friendly page    

January 12, 2007
E-mail: jamie.van.fossen@legis.state.ia.us 

 Session Week 1
Fax: 563-355-9954

READY TO WORK IN DES MOINES

 The 82nd General Assembly kicked off in Des Moines Monday, I am proud to be sworn in as state representative for the seventh time.

 

There will be a lot of work to do this year, including finding new ways to spur economic growth.

 

I look forward to identifying the needs of our area, and working on legislation to directly benefit our local economy.  This year, I believe we have an opportunity to enact some very important bills that will solve some of Iowa’s economic roadblocks.

 

I am encouraged by Iowa’s 3.4 percent unemployment rate, which is Iowa’s lowest in years.  However, The Legislature is aware that there is still a lot of work to be done.

 

I also plan to continue the work of last year’s session to ensure dollars meant for the classroom are actually arriving at local schools, and with those dollars should come high standards and a rigorous curriculum for students.

 

We are no longer simply competing with our neighboring states, or even the rest of the country.  Our focus should be on other developing countries, who are graduated some highly skilled workers.  I believe we must prepare our students to remain the world’s leaders in the 21st Century global economy.

 

Another place Iowa can lead is through the renewable fuels industry.

 

This is an exciting time for our state.  We are on the cusp of an alternative energy explosion, and all of Iowa will be lifted as a result.  We literally stand on the land that can offer energy independence and a cleaner environment.

I will serve on Ways & Means, Commerce, Economic Growth, and Local Government committees, which he says will enable him to focus on the district, thereby benefiting the area.

These are committees where I felt I could have a positive impact at home.  I am awaiting the challenges facing state government, but I know that by working together with other legislators, we can pass some meaningful bills with positive long-term effects.

The 110-day session is scheduled to end the first week of May.

 

IOWA’S RIGHT TO WORK LAW UNDER ATTACK

Recently, some legislators at the Capitol have proposed gutting Iowa’s Right to Work law, thereby forcing employees to join a union, even against the will of the worker. 

 

The Right to Work principle affirms the right of every American to work for a living without being compelled to belong to a union.  Compulsory unionism in any form--"union”, "closed”, or "agency" shop--is a contradiction of the Right to Work principle and the fundamental human right that the principle represents.

 

In 1947, the Taft-Hartley amendments to the 1935 National Labor Relations Act affirmed states’ right to pass Right-to-Work laws.  Right-to-Work laws guarantee that no person can be compelled, as a condition of employment, to join or not to join, nor to pay dues to a labor union.

 

As of January 1, 2006, 22 states had adopted Right-to-Work laws.  Because of this, those states have seen a significantly better environment for business, and businesses have reacted by locating there.  Many Iowa companies have located here because our state is a Right-to-Work state.

 

“Fee for Service, Agency Fee, and Fair Share” – These three phrases have been tossed around by some legislators.  All of these phrases describe the same thing – requiring an employee that is covered in a bargaining unit to pay money to the union that represents their bargaining unit. 

 

Fee for Service, Agency Fee and Fair Share all mean the same thing – a repeal of Right-to-Work laws and Forced Unionism.

 

I believe employees should have the right to choose whether to belong to a union, and I will not be supportive of this effort.

 

Quick Facts on Right to Work (RTW):

 

  • No state has ever successfully repealed their RTW statute.

  • No RTW state has ever successfully implemented an “agency fee”, etc.

  • Any state that has an “agency fee” is not considered a RTW state!  Thus, Iowa would lose its RTW status by implementing such a fee.

  • 80% of Iowans support RTW.

  • RTW is highlighted by county economic development offices as one of the “Advantages of Doing Business in Iowa.”  Repealing RTW would put Iowa at a competitive disadvantage.

 

REVENUE RUNNING STRONG THROUGH FIRST SIX MONTHS

 Through the first half of Fiscal Year (FY) 07, General Fund revenue growth continued to be strong compared to the first half of FY 06.

Through the first six months of the fiscal year, gross General Fund revenue grew by $143.8 million, or 5.4 percent compared to the first six months of FY 06.

The REC estimate for FY 06 is an increase of $285 million (4.9 percent) compared to FY 06.  Despite the REC increasing the revenue estimate in December, revenue continues to exceed expectations.

Once again, all major revenue sources increased compared to the first half FY 06.  Personal income tax increased by $68.5 million, or 5.5 percent, sales and use taxes were up $7.1 million or 0.8 percent, corporate tax payments were up $56.8 million, or a whopping 42.1 percent.  Other taxes were up $9.1 million or 5.8 percent and other receipts were up $2.2 million, or 1.2 percent.

If revenue comes in at the REC estimate of 4.9 percent (which appears likely), the FY 07 budget will end up with a surplus of $266 million.  Assuming minimal supplemental appropriations (including no need for a supplemental for Medicaid for the first time in five fiscal years) and filling the reserves to 10 percent of the budget, there will be at least $225 million left over to transfer into the Senior Living Trust Fund (SLTF).  However, only $201 million is needed to completely repay the SLTF to $300 million.

 Under the law approved last year, all of the ending balance not needed to fill the reserves to 10 percent is transferred to the SLTF.  In his opening day speech, Representative Rants challenged the new majority to use the entire surplus not needed to fill the reserves to 10 percent or for minimal supplemental appropriations to repay the SLTF.  However, it is unlikely the majority party will agree to the challenge because they will need every penny of the FY 07 surplus to fund all of their priorities.

 The revenue outlook for FY 08 is also rosy.  For FY 08, the REC has projected a 3.5 percent increase in gross revenue.  Due to the increase in FY 07 (which increases the FY 08 base revenue) and the FY 08 increase, the majority party will have over $400 million to spend on the FY 08 budget.  However, with nearly $600 million in built-in and anticipated spending increases, it is easy to see why the majority will need the entire FY 07 surplus and FY 08 revenue to fund all of their spending priorities.

The bottom line is that House Republicans will work with the new majority if it proposes budget ideas like repaying the SLTF.  However, House Republicans will not be willing to help the majority overspend and undo all of the hard work that was done the past four years to get the state’s finances in order.

 

MINIMUM WAGE – FIRST BILL INTRODUCED--CONTROVERSY OVER SENATE COLA INCREASE

 

In September 1997, Congress approved the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which established minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments.

The federal minimum wage for covered non-exempt employees is $5.15 an hour.  The federal minimum wage provisions are contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  Many states also have minimum wage laws. 

Various minimum wage exceptions apply under specific circumstances to workers with disabilities, full-time students, youth under age 20 in their first 90 consecutive calendar days of employment, tipped employees and student-learners.

In 1989, the Democrat-controlled Iowa Legislature established a state minimum wage law.  This provision set Iowa’s minimum wage at the higher of the federal minimum wage law or $4.65.  Due to the passage of the federal FLSA, Iowa employees are entitled to $5.15 an hour because that is the higher of the two.

The “training wage” is $4.25.

House File 1

 House File 1, sponsored by all 54 House Democrats, increases the state hourly minimum wage in a two-part jump.

 The minimum wage would increase to $6.20 on April 1, 2007.  Then, on January 1, 2008, the minimum wage would jump to $7.25.

 House File 1 also increases the training wage to $5.30 on April 1, 2007 and $6.35 on January 1, 2008.

Senate File 1

 Senate File 1, sponsored by all Senate Democrats, is similar to House File 1, with two major exceptions. 

 Senate File 1 provides for an automatic annual increase or cost of living allowance (COLA) of the state minimum wage.  This increase is based on the yearly increase in the consumer price index.  Additionally, the Senate bill eliminates the “training wage”.

The so-called “cost of living adjustment”:

Forces automatic pay increases regardless of performance.

Forces automatic increases with no guarantee of increased revenue to the business.

Only two other states in the nation adjust their minimum wage:

Vermont – Beginning on January 1, 2007, and on each subsequent January 1, the minimum wage rate is increased by five percent or the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index, or city average, not seasonally adjusted.

Washington -- Beginning January 1, 2001, and annually thereafter, the rate is adjusted for inflation by a calculation using the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers for the prior year.

 

Ways & Means Update

Bills introduced in committee this week:
No bills introduced in committee
Bills passed out of committee this week:
No bills passed committee
 

   Week in Review Archives

2006 Session
05-05-06
04-28-06
04-21-06
04-14-06
04-07-06
03-31-06
03-24-06
03-17-06
03-10-06
03-03-06
02-24-06
02-10-06
02-03-06
01-27-06
01-20-06
01-13-06

2005 Session
05-20-05
05-13-05
05-06-05
04-29-05
04-22-05
04-15-05
04-08-05
04-01-05
03-25-05
03-18-05
03-11-05
03-04-05
02-25-05
02-18-05
02-11-05
02-04-05
01-28-05
01-21-05
01-14-05

2004 Session
09-07-04
04-28-04
04-16-04
04-09-04
04-02-04
03-26-04
03-19-04
03-12-04
03-05-04
02-27-04
02-20-04
02-13-04
02-06-04
01-30-04
01-23-04
01-16-04

2003 Session
06-04-03 Special Session
05-30-03 Special Session
05-02-03
04-25-03
04-18-03
04-11-03
04-04-03
03-28-03
03-21-03
03-14-03
03-07-03
02-28-03
02-21-03
02-14-03
02-07-03
01-31-03
01-17-03
01-24-03

2002 Session
05-28-02 Special Session II 
05-10-02 Special Edition
04-22-02 Special Session I
04-12-02
04-05-02
03-29-02
03-22-02
03-15-02

03-08-02

03-01-02
02-22-02
02-15-02
02-08-02

02-01-02
01-25-02
01-18-02

2001 Session
05-04-01
04-27-01
04-20-01
04-13-01
04-06-01

03-30-01

03-23-01
03-16-01
03-09-01
03-02-01
02-23-01
02-16-01
02-09-01
02-02-01
01-26-01
01-19-01

01-12-01

2000 Session
04-28-00
04-21-00
04-14-00
04-07-00
03-31-00
03-24-00
03-17-00
03-10-00
03-03-00
02-25-00